Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Toyo Proxes Comfort Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Toyo Proxes Comfort
Table of contents:
| # | Kumho Ecsta HS52 | Toyo Proxes Comfort | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Toyo Proxes Comfort are two touring summer tyres that have notably fared well in our tests, hitting a percentage ranking of 81% and 72% respectively. Their strengths and weaknesses have been clear based on the data collected from a range of tyre tests, making it easier for shoppers to decide which is the best fit for their vehicle and driving requirements.
The Kumho Ecsta HS52, successor to the popular Kumho Ecsta HS51, has seemingly outperformed its predecessor. The tyre consistently shows strong results in both wet and dry conditions, ranking 3rd out of 51 tyres in the Autobild test. Its best features were noted as dry handling, dry braking, and wet braking, making it a reliable choice for drivers no matter the weather. However, criticisms were modest comfort and weaknesses in environmental performance and efficiency. More about Kumho.
On the other hand, the Toyo Proxes Comfort, manufactured in Japan by Toyo, has a significant following owing to its dynamic handling on both wet and dry surfaces as well as its quietness and reasonable price level. In the Autobild test, it landed a solid 9th place out of 51 tyres, with strong points being its dry handling and dry braking. However, criticisms were drawn towards its decreased lifespan and extended wet braking. In terms of mutual test positions, it generally positions lower than HS52, making it the less high-performing tyre of the two.
Given the data from all tests, it appears that while both the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Toyo Proxes Comfort have several strengths and weaknesses, the HS52 performs better overall. It bags higher ratings, performs better in tests, and offers a balanced performance with convincing driving features on both dry and wet surfaces compared to Toyo Proxes Comfort. The Toyo Proxes Comfort, though, may be the more affordable option for those looking to limit noise and provide a comfortable ride.
In conclusion, both tyres cater to different needs. The Kumho Ecsta HS52 seems fit for those looking for overall performance, while the Toyo Proxes Comfort could be a great pick for those prioritizing ride comfort and quietness over high-end performance.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Toyo Proxes Comfort Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Toyo Proxes Comfort Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes Comfort | 36,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Recommended | 1 | ||||||
| Toyo Proxes Comfort | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,3 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes Comfort Rating: Good | 2,5 | 2,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Toyo Proxes Comfort Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2+ | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes Comfort | 35,9 | 29,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||