Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Table of contents:
| # | Kleber Dynaxer UHP | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R24 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today, we are putting two summer tyres under the microscope - the Kleber Dynaxer UHP and the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti. Both tyres are great choices for the hot season, but we are trying to find out which one performs better according to tests and reviews.
Firstly, let’s start with the Kleber Dynaxer UHP. This tyre shows a rating of 68% in our tests, providing good overall performance over different conditions. The Dynaxer UHP doesn't seem to be replaced by a newer model. Although it was not amongst the top performers in the Autobild test, where it took 15th place out of 53, it is still a reliable choice given the fierce competition it faced.
On the other hand, we have the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti. With a rating of 55% in our tests, its main strength lies undoubtedly in wet conditions. It presents outstanding performance in concrete aspects such as aquaplaning - cross, wet braking, wet handling, and wet side guide, as displayed in the Autobild test. This particular performance allowed the Vorti to take the 9th position in the test, making it a strong competitor when it comes to handling adverse weather conditions. This tyre is made in the Netherlands by Vredestein, another competitive player in the tyre industry.
In conclusion, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP and the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti are each unique in their strengths. If you are looking for a tyre that offers good all-around performance, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP seems to stand out in the competition. However, if your driving conditions commonly include wet surfaces, or if you prioritize safety over various terrains, then the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti might be the most dependable choice. Not much difference when it comes to their overall rating but depending on your needs and driving habits, each tyre can easily be the best choice.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 34,1 | 32,2 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 33,4 | 31,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 35,9 | 32,1 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 35,3 | 30,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||