Segment
1. Nokian Wetproof SUV Upper-middle2. Imperial EcoSport SUV Lowcost
Comparison: Imperial EcoSport SUV vs. Nokian Wetproof SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Imperial (17%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 215/60 R17 test, where both the EcoSport SUV and the Wetproof SUV were tested.
| # | Imperial EcoSport SUV | Nokian Wetproof SUV | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R117 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Grass traction
Gravel traction
Mud traction
Sand traction
Handling on gravel
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian Wetproof SUV 71 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Imperial EcoSport SUV Rating: Not recommended | 3+ | 3+ | 2 | ||||
| Nokian WetProof SUV Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||