Segment
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Sava (61%). In this particular case, the Sava Eskimo HP2 has a better rating of 75% compared to 68% of the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Sava Eskimo HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 and the Eskimo HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 90% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (57%) of the Sava Eskimo HP2 also have C wet ratings. We also know where Winter i*cept RS2 W452 is made - Korea.
# | Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | Sava Eskimo HP2 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R15 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 14.31
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 71 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 1- | 2 | 2+ | ||
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2+ | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 33,4 | 28,2 | |||||
Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,5 | 28 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,3 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 1,0 | 1,8 |
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Good | 2,0 | 2,5 | 2,1 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 1,9 |
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,1 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,9 |
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | |||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 1 | 2 | |||
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 1- | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 32 | 24,9 | |||||
Sava Eskimo HP2 | 33,6 | 24,1 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 35,9 | 28,6 | |||||
Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,4 | 27,2 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,0 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 3,6 | 1,5 | 2,1 |
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 3,6 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
Show test details |