Segment
2. Tristar Snowpower UHP Lowcost
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A vs. Tristar Snowpower UHP
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tristar). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Tristar (1%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 235/55 R18 test, where both the Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A and the Snowpower UHP were tested.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A | Tristar Snowpower UHP | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 2+ | 3+ | 2- | ||
| Tristar Snowpower UHP Rating: Not recommended | 4 | 2 | 3+ | 2 | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||