Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Kumho (54%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 has a better rating of 77% compared to 67% of the Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 was done in 2022, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (79%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 also have A wet ratings. We also know where Ventus S1 evo Z K129 is made - Hungary.
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 | Kumho Ecsta PS71 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ? dB