Segment
2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS51
Table of contents:
| # | Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 | Kumho Ecsta HS51 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 and the Kumho Ecsta HS51 are both summer tyres built for performance and safety. Both models have been extensively tested according to various metrics by reputable organizations such as Autobild, ADAC, and Teknikens. In our overall rating, the Goodyear model has a rating of 88% while Kumho's gets 45%, but it's worth taking a closer look at individual aspects of each tire.
The Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2, the successor of the Efficient Grip Performance model, shows significant improvements with strengths like mileage, price/value, and comfort. In tests performed by Autobild among 53 total tyres, it impressively ranked 13th. Furthermore, it earned the 4th place in the ADAC test and 2nd in the Teknikens test. Overall, this tyre stands out in its class for its excellent longevity and driving comfort.
On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 has been recently replaced by the HS52 model. Made in China, this tyre is highly valued for its wet handling, aquaplaning resistance (both cross and longitudal) and its noise-friendly exterior. It particularly performed impressively at 3rd place in the Autobild test among 53 total tyres. In the ADAC test, it was only slightly behind at 5th place, and it was at 7th in the Teknikens test.
In a head-to-head comparison, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 generally ranks higher in tests. However, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 has regularly shown excellent wet performance and price/value making it a competitive choice. It's also worth checking the newer HS52 model from Kumho as it promises further improvements.
Overall, your tyre choice will depend on your priorities, as both offer considerable strengths. For long-lasting tyres that provide driving comfort, the Efficient Grip Performance 2 from Goodyear would be the better choice. However, for cost-effective performance, particularly in wet conditions, consider the Ecsta HS51 from Kumho.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Exemplary2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Satisfactory2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 | 36,1 | 31,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 | 34,8 | 30,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,4 | 2,7 | ||||
| Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 2,6 | 2,8 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 61 | 11 | 12 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 | 59 | 24 | 16 | 9 | 10 | ||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 | 45 | 24 | 13 | 2 | 6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||