• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Nokian WR A4

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Fulda winter tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 has a better rating of 76% compared to 47% of the Nokian WR A4. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Kristall Control HP2 and the WR A4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 60% of Fulda Kristall Control HP2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (94%) of the Nokian WR A4 also have B wet ratings.

# Fulda Kristall Control HP2
/76%
Nokian WR A4
/47%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR15 - R19 R16 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+1-2+1-
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Good
2-2-2+ 2+
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Satisfactory
2-22-2
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test30,324,3
Fulda Kristall Control HP236,324,5
Nokian WR A434,625,5
Show test details
Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test1-2+2+
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Satisfactory
3+2-2+
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Satisfactory
3+22-
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowEnviromental impact
Best values in test9,69,29,910
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Recommended
6,87,39,57,9
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Still recommended
6,39,2 7,110
Show test details