Segment
1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Nokian WR D4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Falken (48%). In this particular case, the Falken EuroWinter HS01 has a better rating of 66% compared to 54% of the Nokian WR D4. The first tyre test of Falken EuroWinter HS01 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR D4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the EuroWinter HS01 and the WR D4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the EuroWinter HS01 is made in Turkey and WR D4 is made in Finland.
| # | Falken EuroWinter HS01 | Nokian WR D4 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R21 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian WR D4 73%
Wet braking
2. Nokian WR D4 73%
Wet handling
2. Nokian WR D4 63%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Nokian WR D4 72%
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian WR D4 73%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Nokian WR D4 84%
Dry driving behavior
2. Nokian WR D4 68%
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
1. Nokian WR D4 93%
Snow braking
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
Snow handling
1. Nokian WR D4 92%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
Interior noise
1. Nokian WR D4 73%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR D4 ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Nokian WR D4 63%
Fuel efficiency
1. Nokian WR D4 89%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
1. Nokian WR D4 88%
Ice lateral guidance
1. Nokian WR D4 82%
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Recommended | 2,5 | 2,7 | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Recommended | 2,9 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 3,0 | 1,7 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2- | 2- | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2- | 1 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Falken EuroWinter HS01 | 36,2 | 28 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 27,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
| Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,6 | 3,1 | 2,9 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,3 |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,3 | 1,7 | 2,4 | 3,6 | 3,0 | 1,9 |
| Show test details | |||||||