Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
Table of contents:
| # | Falken Azenis FK510 | Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R99 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today we are comparing two well-known summer tyres, the Falken Azenis FK510 and the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. The Azenis FK510 is manufactured by Falken, while the Advan Fleva V701 is produced by Yokohama.
Looking at the ratings, the Falken Azenis FK510 stands out with an impressive 90% rating, while the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 lags behind at 57%. Moreover, it is essential to note that the FK510 has been replaced by a newer model, the Falken Azenis FK520.
Moving on to the test results, we analyzed the data from the Autobild test, which featured a total of 52 tyres. The Azenis FK510 showcased its exceptional performance by securing the 3rd position undoubtedly proving its superiority over the Advan Fleva V701, which ended up at the 15th position.
Considering their manufacturing, the Azenis FK510 is produced in Japan and Turkey, while the manufacturing details for the Advan Fleva V701 are not provided.
Summing up, let's highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each tyre:
Falken Azenis FK510:
- Strengths: High rating in tests, excellent performance, and overall impressive driving experience.
- Weaknesses: Some drivers may prefer the updated model, the Falken Azenis FK520.
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701:
- Strengths: Decent performance and suitable for drivers looking for mid-tier summer tyres.
- Weaknesses: Significantly lower rating compared to the Azenis FK510, and not as impressive test results.
In conclusion, the Falken Azenis FK510 outshines the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in test results and overall rating. The FK510 offers an exceptional performance and a more satisfying driving experience. On the other hand, the Advan Fleva V701 could still be a suitable option for drivers seeking mid-tier summer tyres. However, it is crucial to consider the newer model of the Azenis FK510, the Falken Azenis FK520, which may provide an even better driving experience.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 29 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | 35,2 | 32,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3+ | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 35,5 | 34,8 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | 34,9 | 40,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||