Segment
1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Premium2. Falken Azenis FK453 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Dunlop summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Falken (59%). In this particular case, the Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 has a better rating of 79% compared to 5% of the Falken Azenis FK453. The first tyre test of Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Falken Azenis FK453 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Automotorsport 2016 235/40 R18 test, where both the SP Sport MAXX RT2 and the Azenis FK453 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 92% of Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Falken Azenis FK453 also have A wet ratings.
# | Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | Falken Azenis FK453 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Premium2. Falken Azenis FK453 Upper-middle
1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Highly recommended2. Falken Azenis FK453 Conditionally recommended
1. Falken Azenis FK453 Conditionally recommended2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Still recommended
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,6 | 9,5 | 10 | 10 | ||
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Rating: Highly recommended | 9,0 | 8,9 | 9,1 | 10 | 8 | ||
Falken Azenis FK453 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,8 | 7,5 | 8,2 | 6 | 10 | ||
Show test details |