Segment
1. Debica Presto UHP Lowcost2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Debica summer tyres are slightly better rated (45%) than Sava (43%). In this particular case, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 has a better rating of 73% compared to 22% of the Debica Presto UHP. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP was done in 2020, compared to 2017 when was the Sava Intensa UHP 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Presto UHP and the Intensa UHP 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Debica Presto UHP has C wet grip rating, whereas 72% of Sava Intensa UHP 2 has A rating.
| # | Debica Presto UHP | Sava Intensa UHP 2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 11.31
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP | 36,1 | 32,8 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 34,7 | 35,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||