Segment
1. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Premium2. Debica Frigo 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Frigo 2 vs. Vredestein Snowtrac 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). In this particular case, the Debica Frigo 2 has a better rating of 50% compared to 45% of the Vredestein Snowtrac 5. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo 2 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Vredestein Snowtrac 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Frigo 2 and the Snowtrac 5 were tested.
| # | Debica Frigo 2 | Vredestein Snowtrac 5 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 12.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Satisfactory2. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Still recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Interior noise
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Debica Frigo 2 68 dB
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Ice lateral guidance
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Debica Frigo 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,2 |
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,9 | 2,5 | 1,8 |
| Show test details | |||||||