Segment
2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Germany. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Fulda (55%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 860 has a better rating of 86% compared to 76% of the Fulda Kristall Control HP2. The first tyre test of Continental WinterContact TS 860 was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 225/50 R17 test, where both the WinterContact TS 860 and the Kristall Control HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Continental WinterContact TS 860 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (60%) of the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 also have B wet ratings. We also know where WinterContact TS 860 is made - Portugal/Slovakia.
# | Continental WinterContact TS 860 | Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R15 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good
2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 1,5 | |
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,9 | 3,0 | 2,1 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | |
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 3,2 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 3,7 | 2,5 | |
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 200 | 67 | 48 | 60 | 18 | 9 | |
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Recommended | 192 | 63 | 48 | 52 | 18 | 7 | |
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Recommended | 177 | 56 | 45 | 57 | 16 | 3 | |
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | |||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | |||
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 31,5 | 24,5 | |||||
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 33,5 | 24,3 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 |
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,5 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,7 |
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,8 | 2,3 | 3,6 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 34,5 | 27,6 | |||||
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 34,8 | 27,6 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | |||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | |||
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 1- | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 33,5 | 27,5 | |||||
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 35,5 | 28,1 | |||||
Show test details |