Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Table of contents:
| # | Continental PremiumContact 7 | Kumho Ecsta HS52 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The two tyres that are being compared today are the Continental PremiumContact 7 and the Kumho Ecsta HS52, both of which are summer touring tyres.
The Continental PremiumContact 7 is an impressive tyre, consistently ranking first in multiple tests such as Vibilagare, Autobild and ADAC. This is a testament to its quality and credibility in the tyre space. It boasts superior dry braking, wet braking, and wet circle cornering, which makes it a top choice for those in search of a reliable summer tyre. It is made in various European countries including France, Slovakia, Germany, and Czech Republic. It is worth noting that this model replaced the Continental PremiumContact 6 and the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5. Even with a few weaknesses in aquaplaning behaviour and slightly heavier weight as reported in the ADAC 2024 test, there are no reported weaknesses that outshine its overall performance.
On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has garnered a rating of 81% on our site. According to Autobild and ADAC tests, it shows impressive dry handling and wet braking, alongside a commendable mileage and performance on wet circle cornering. However, unlike the Continental tyre, the model was outperformed in some tests (position 13 in Autoklub ČR) and gained some criticism for its relatively average wet grip and slightly uncomfortable rolling noise. But its overall performance is still strong, especially considering its affordable price tag and predicted high mileage. Its being the successor to the Kumho Ecsta HS51 proves that it was a worthy upgrade.
In conclusion, both tyres are excellent summer options for any vehicle. The Continental PremiumContact 7 held its own and consistently ranked first across several tyre tests. It demonstrates unparalleled performance on both wet and dry roads. The Kumho Ecsta HS52, on the other hand, provides a more budget-friendly alternative that doesn't compromise on quality. While it might not have matched Continental's performance in some tests, it offers exceptional dry handling and braking capabilities and was rated particularly well for its mileage.
To learn more about Continental tyres, click here, and for more on Kumho, click here.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Test winner2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ? dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 87 | ||||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 87 | ||||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 84 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continental PremiumContact 7 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,7 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 Rating: Good | 2,6 | 1,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 104,7 | 106 | 103,4 | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 104,7 | 106 | 103,3 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 96,9 | 94,3 | 99,5 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 Rating: Test winner | 1 | ||||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Recommended | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||