Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
Table of contents:
| # | Continental PremiumContact 6 | Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this article, we will compare two summer tyres: the Continental PremiumContact 6 and the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. Both tyres are designed for high-performance driving and have been ranked in various tests. Let's examine their strengths and weaknesses according to the given data and test results.
The Continental PremiumContact 6: is a touring tyre manufactured by Continental in countries such as SK, DE, and CZ. It carries an overall rating of 90% and has been replaced by the Continental PremiumContact 7. The PremiumContact 6 is the successor to the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5.
The Yokohama Advan Fleva V701: is a summer tyre designed by Yokohama. It has an overall rating of 57% but does not currently have a newer model replacing it.
According to the Autobild test, the Continental PremiumContact 6 ranked 1st out of 52 total tyres tested, while the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 ranked 15th. This indicates that the PremiumContact 6 outperforms the Advan Fleva V701 overall in various test categories.
Strengths of the Continental PremiumContact 6: This tyre offers exceptional performance in wet and dry conditions, ensuring high levels of grip and stability throughout its usage. The PremiumContact 6 is also praised for its short braking distances and fuel efficiency, which makes it suitable for those looking for a safe and cost-effective solution for their vehicles.
Weaknesses of the Continental PremiumContact 6: Some users may find the noise levels to be slightly higher than expected, but this is a minor drawback compared to its overall performance and rating.
Strengths of the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701: The Advan Fleva V701 provides good grip and handling in both wet and dry conditions. It also offers a comfortable ride, which can enhance the overall driving experience for users.
Weaknesses of the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701: Its lower overall rating suggests that its performance may not be as consistent or reliable as the Continental PremiumContact 6. Additionally, some users may find the tyre to produce more noise and to wear down more quickly over time when compared to its competitors.
To summarize, the Continental PremiumContact 6 is a superior tyre in terms of overall performance when compared to the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701, as evidenced by its higher ranking in the Autobild test. While both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses, the PremiumContact 6 appears to offer a more reliable and efficient driving experience for users.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 35,8 | 29,9 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | 35,2 | 32,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3+ | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 34,9 | 35 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | 34,9 | 40,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||