Segment
2. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs. Uniroyal RainSport 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Uniroyal). Uniroyal is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Uniroyal (55%). In this particular case, the Uniroyal RainSport 3 has a better rating of 51% compared to 44% of the Continental ContiSportContact 5. The first tyre test of Continental ContiSportContact 5 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Uniroyal RainSport 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2016 225/45 R17 test, where both the ContiSportContact 5 and the RainSport 3 were tested.
| # | Continental ContiSportContact 5 | Uniroyal RainSport 3 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiSportContact 5 Very good2. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Continental ContiSportContact 5 Rating: Good | 1,9 | 1,2 | 2,0 | 3,3 | 2,1 | ||
| Uniroyal Rainsport 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,5 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||