Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo vs. Yokohama W.drive V905
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (46%) than Yokohama (43%). In this particular case, the Yokohama W.drive V905 has a better rating of 35% compared to 5% of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the Blizzak LM-80 Evo and the W.drive V905 were tested.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo | Yokohama W.drive V905 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 406 | 147 | 134 | 143 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Rating: - | 355 | 97 | 123 | 135 | |||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: - | 324 | 59 | 134 | 123 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||