Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (46%) than Yokohama (43%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 92% compared to 35% of the Yokohama W.drive V905. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Yokohama W.drive V905 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the W.drive V905 were tested. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /92%	Yokohama W.drive V905 /35%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R16 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

/92%

Yokohama W.drive V905

/35%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R14 - R22

R16 - R19

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 47x

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.21

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2023

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
83%

Yokohama
W.drive V905
65%

Snow braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

Snow traction

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 77%

Snow handling

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 76%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 75%

Snow acceleration

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 94%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Lateral guidance on snow

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 76%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 27%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
91%

Yokohama
W.drive V905
69%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 67%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 67%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 67%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905
90%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
83%

Dry braking

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

Dry handling

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

Dry steering response

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Dry lane changing

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 100%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 80%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
81%

Yokohama
W.drive V905
66%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Interior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 53%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ? dB

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
75%

Yokohama
W.drive V905
73%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 74%

Mileage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 62%

Price/value

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 79%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

Fuel efficiency

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 78%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
80%

Yokohama
W.drive V905
75%

Ice braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 78%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 73%

Add to comparison

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2-	2
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands