Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (46%) than GT (38%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 92% compared to 68% of the GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2021 when was the GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland and Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 is made in China.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
Worst rating in test
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow traction
Snow handling
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 | 37,3 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,8 | 1,4 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,1 | 3,4 | 2,5 |
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 2,7 | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 2,5 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,0 | |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,7 | 2,5 | 2,8 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 3,0 | |
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,5 | 3,5 | 2,4 | 2,4 | 2,7 | 3,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 8,7 | 9,6 | 9,3 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good | 8,7 | 9,6 | 8,6 | 8,2 | 8 | 7 | |
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 Rating: Good | 7,1 | 6,9 | 7,8 | 6,5 | 7 | 8 | |
| Show test details | |||||||