Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Lowcost
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Switzerland (Esa-Tecar). Generally, Esa-Tecar winter tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 92% compared to 60% of the Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2020 when was the Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the Super Grip Pro were tested. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good2. Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow traction
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Snow acceleration
Lateral guidance on snow
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry steering response
Dry lane changing
Dry driving behavior
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Ice lateral guidance
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,5 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 0,8 | 1,8 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,5 | 3,0 | 2,2 | 2,4 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,8 |
| Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,3 | |
| Show test details | |||||||