Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 92% compared to 83% of the Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 225/45 R18 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the ContiWinterContact TS 850P were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R22 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | ||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 1- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2+ | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | 2 | |||
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 30,3 | 24,5 | |||||
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P | 31,8 | 25,2 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,5 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 0,8 | 1,8 |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,5 | 3,0 | 2,2 | 2,4 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,8 |
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Satisfactory | 1,9 | 3,4 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 1,5 | 2,1 |
Show test details |
Name | Points total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 8,9 | ||||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good | 8,8 | ||||||
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Very good | 8,1 | ||||||
Show test details |