Segment
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO vs. Sava Eskimo HP2
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Sava Eskimo HP2 has a better rating of 75% compared to 52% of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO was done in 2018, compared to 2017 when was the Sava Eskimo HP2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO has B wet grip rating, whereas 57% of Sava Eskimo HP2 has C rating.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO | Sava Eskimo HP2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 14.31
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Still recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Rolling resistance
Price/value
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 71 dB