10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Pirelli winter tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than BFGoodrich (67%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 89% compared to 60% of the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 225/40 R18 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the Winter Sottozero 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland and Winter Sottozero 3 is made in Italy.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /89%	Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 /60%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R17 - R99
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 16

Number of tests

1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 27x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 19x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 2.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 11.

2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 19.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 5.63

2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 8.07

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 2021

Best rating in test

1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Exemplary

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Still recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%

Pirelli
Winter Sottozero 3
68%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 67%

Wet braking

1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 73%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 71%

Wet handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 62%

Wet circle cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 65%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Pirelli
Winter Sottozero 3
76%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%

Dry braking

1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 79%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Dry handling

1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 72%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%

Pirelli
Winter Sottozero 3
70%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 65%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 71%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 70%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 72%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%

Pirelli
Winter Sottozero 3
70%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 72%

Comfort

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 68%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69 dB

2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%

Pirelli
Winter Sottozero 3
68%

Rolling resistance

1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

Mileage

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 82%

2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 67%

Price/value

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 55%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
80.5%

Pirelli
Winter Sottozero 3
73.8%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	1-
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2+
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	2-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: Satisfactory	2	2-	3+	3+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: Satisfactory	1-	2	3+	3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3	32,2	29,8
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands