10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Kumho (48%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 89% compared to 54% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP71. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 225/40 R18 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the WinterCraft WP71 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 has C rating. We also know where G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made - Romania/Poland.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /89%	Kumho WinterCraft WP71 /54%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R16 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 54

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 19x

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 11x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 6.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 11.

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 28.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 5.63

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 12.55

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 2020

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71
82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

Wet braking

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 88%

Wet handling

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 72%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

Wet circle cornering

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 77%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71
75%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%

Dry braking

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

Dry handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 66%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
92%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71
65%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 95%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 64%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 94%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 77%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 59%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 62%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71
68%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 70%

Comfort

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 67%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69 dB

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71
63%

Rolling resistance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 53%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
80.5%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71
?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	1-
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Conditionally recommended	2+	2-	3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Conditionally recommended	2+	3+	2	3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Kumho WinterCraft WP71	34,8	29,2
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands