10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than BFGoodrich (67%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P has a better rating of 97% compared to 89% of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2021 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/60 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the WinterContact TS 870 P were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland and WinterContact TS 870 P is made in Czech Republic.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /89%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /97%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R16 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 83

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 19x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 15x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 8.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 11.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.33

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 5.63

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2023

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
81%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 73%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 77%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 59%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
90%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 93%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
87%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
84%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 84%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 86%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 85%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
85%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
72%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 82%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
60%

Mileage

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 71%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 56%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
80.5%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2.4	2.7
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good	2.5	2.3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1-	2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	2+	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,2	29,3
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	34,9	30,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	34,6	25,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2-	2	1-	2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good	2+	2+	1-	3
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands