Segment
2. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Barum (52%). In this particular case, the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 has a better rating of 68% compared to 44% of the Barum Polaris 3. The first tyre test of Barum Polaris 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Polaris 3 and the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Barum Polaris 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (90%) of the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 also have C wet ratings.
# | Barum Polaris 3 | Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
2. Barum Polaris 3 10.6
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended
1. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory
2. Barum Polaris 3 ? dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 1- | 1- | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
Barum Polaris 3 | 36,7 | 27,8 | |||||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 34,9 | 27,7 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
Barum Polaris 3 | 35,8 | 27,6 | |||||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 35,9 | 28,6 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: - | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: - | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
Barum Polaris 3 | 37,2 | 26,1 | |||||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 39,1 | 26,2 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 1 | 1,5 |
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: - | 3,4 | 2,2 | 2,1 | 2,8 | 3,6 | 1,5 | 2,0 |
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: - | 2,8 | 1,9 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 4,0 | 2,5 | 2,3 |
Show test details |