Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Upper-middle2. Apollo Aspire XP Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Aspire XP vs. Kleber Dynaxer UHP
Table of contents:
| # | Apollo Aspire XP | Kleber Dynaxer UHP | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Here at our site, we are comparing two exemplary summer tyres that have undergone thorough testing, the Apollo Aspire XP and the Kleber Dynaxer UHP tyres.
Let's dive deeper into these models from Apollo and Kleber respectively.
The Apollo Aspire XP is a summer tyre that boasts a rating of 53% on our site. This particular model does not have any previous models and there exists no newer tyre replacing this model. The Aspire XP excels in its Rolling resistance, one of the best features highlighted in the Autobild test, where it ranked 14th out of 53 tyres.
On the other hand, we have the Kleber Dynaxer UHP, also a summer tyre, that stands out with an impressive rating of 68% on our site. Similar to the Apollo Aspire XP, there is no past model or newer tyre replacing this model. In the Autobild test, it managed to secure the 15th spot out of 53 tyres, just one spot behind the Apollo Aspire XP.
However, it's important to note that overall the Kleber Dynaxer UHP is a stronger performer according to our ratings, as it commands a 15% higher rating than the Apollo Aspire XP. This simply means Dynaxer UHP is expected to yield overall better performance.
Both tyres, being summer tyres, perform exceptionally well under warm, dry conditions, complemented by superior grip and lower wear, ensuring they last longer. However, there is not much known about their performance as first equipment tyres.
To conclude, the Apollo Aspire XP excels when it comes to rolling resistance and is generally a good summer tyre option. However, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP comes out on top according to our ratings and justifiably so due to its well-rounded performance, thereby making it a slightly better choice than the former.
Remember, choosing the right tyre largely depends on your specific needs and driving conditions. Both Apollo and Kleber have a long history and established track record in producing high-quality tyres. Here, we present comprehensive, reliable data to aid in your decision, but the final choice depends on your preference and requirements.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Apollo Aspire XP 8.56
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Aspire XP Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Aspire XP Good2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Apollo Aspire XP ? dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Apollo Aspire XP Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Apollo Aspire XP | 34,7 | 30,3 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 34,1 | 32,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Apollo Aspire XP Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Apollo Aspire XP | 36,3 | 31 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 35,9 | 32,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||