Comparison: Apollo Aspire XP Winter vs. Nokian WR Snowproof

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Apollo winter tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Apollo Aspire XP Winter has a better rating of 82% compared to 57% of the Nokian WR Snowproof. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the Aspire XP Winter and the WR Snowproof were tested. See more mutual tests below.

#	Apollo Aspire XP Winter /82%	Nokian WR Snowproof /57%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R16 - R18	R14 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

/82%

Nokian WR Snowproof

/57%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R16 - R18

R14 - R20

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 58

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 20

Number of tests

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 14x

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 6x

Best position in test

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 1.

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 5.

Worst position in test

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 20.

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 30.

Average position in tests

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 11.17

Year of the last test

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 2023

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 2023

Best rating in test

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Exemplary

2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Good

2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter
84%

Nokian
WR Snowproof
72%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 87%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 70%

Wet braking

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 81%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 76%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 84%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 67%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

2. Nokian WR Snowproof ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof
81%

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter
79%

Snow traction

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 79%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 73%

Snow braking

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 82%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 79%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter
85%

Nokian
WR Snowproof
76%

Mileage

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 80%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 69%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

2. Nokian WR Snowproof ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter
87%

Nokian
WR Snowproof
83%

Dry braking

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 86%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 84%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof
87%

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter
87%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 69 dB

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ? dB

Add to comparison

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R17

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	1,8	2,0
Apollo Aspire XP Winter Rating: Satisfactory	2,6	2,9
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory	2,4	3,2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-
Apollo Aspire XP Winter Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2	1-
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Good	2-	2-	2+	2-
Show test details

Comparison: Apollo Aspire XP Winter vs. Nokian WR Snowproof

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands