Segment
2. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear summer tyres are slightly better rated (72%) than Apollo (47%). In this particular case, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 has a better rating of 87% compared to 56% of the Apollo Alnac 4G. The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G was done in 2015, compared to 2020 when was the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G and the Efficient Grip Performance 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Apollo Alnac 4G | Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost
2. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Exemplary2. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary
1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Satisfactory2. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory
2. Apollo Alnac 4G ? dB
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Good | 3,5 | 3,0 | |||||
GoodYear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Rating: Good | 1,7 | 2,1 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
Apollo Alnac 4G | 36,8 | 33,2 | |||||
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 | 36,1 | 31,7 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,4 | 2,7 | 0,6 | |||
Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 2,6 | 2,8 | ||||
Show test details |