Segment
1. Nexen N fera Sport SUV Lowcost
Comparison: Aplus A919 vs. Nexen N fera Sport SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Aplus) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, Nexen summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Aplus (1%). But when it comes to comparing Aplus A919 and Nexen N fera Sport SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Aplus A919 was done in 2023, compared to 2022 when was the Nexen N fera Sport SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/65 R17 test, where both the A919 and the N fera Sport SUV were tested.
| # | Aplus A919 | Nexen N fera Sport SUV | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Aplus A919 12.
Worst position in test
2. Aplus A919 12.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Aplus A919 46%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Aplus A919 46%
Wet braking
2. Aplus A919 24%
Wet circle cornering
2. Aplus A919 42%
Wet handling
2. Aplus A919 35%
Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Grass traction
1. Aplus A919 100%
Gravel traction
1. Aplus A919 87%
Mud traction
1. Aplus A919 92%
Sand traction
2. Aplus A919 73%
Handling on gravel
1. Aplus A919 73%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Aplus A919 60%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Aplus A919 ? dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Aplus A919 45%
Dry handling
2. Aplus A919 46%
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aplus A919 Rating: Not recommended | |||||||
| Nexen N fera Sport SUV Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||